► Click here to download the original poster (PDF)
Raymond TOGHILL, Department of Haematology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff
• Inversa RR (Mechatronics)
The Inversa is a semi-automatic Westergren ESR analyzer . Results can be provided after 30 minutes but for the purposes of this study, a 1 hour time was used in accordance with the reference methodology. The system aspirates around 1.4ml EDTA whole blood anticoagulated and dilutes it in the device with sodium citrate (4:1). The carousel contains twenty-four glass Westergren pipettes. The measurement is corrected according to the temperature and the test results are expressed in millimeters/hour.
• Alifax Test-1 (Alifax)
The Alifax ESR analyzers measure red blood cell aggregation. Using 175 μl of EDTA blood sample, the test result is expressed in mm/h. The analysis takes around 20 seconds, and the device has a capacity of 60 samples at a time.
• Yumizen H500E OT/CT and Yumizen H550E (HORIBA)
These are a range of haematology instruments that, in addition to full blood count analysis, are capable of producing an ESR result in 60 seconds from a standard EDTA whole blood sample utilizing an ESR technology called CoRA (Correlated Rouleaux Analysis).
Stage 1 - Aspiration
The transparent aspiration tubing contains diluent, which provides a blank value with each measurement, air to create a barrier and then whole blood. As the blood is aspirated, the shearing forces deform the red cells. This ‘stretching’ slightly reduces the ability of the cells to absorb light.
Stage 2 - Relaxation
The aspiration is stopped, allowing the red cells to relax back to their original shape. This action changes the optical absorption of the sample.
Stage 3 Agglomeration
With the blood sample static, the red cells are allowed to agglomerate over 30 seconds to form rouleaux (stacks or rolls of cells). As the rouleaux form, the interstitial spaces increase allowing an increase in light transmission. During all of these stages an optical measurement is made every 50ms and the transmission changes are tracked, allowing a plot called a syllectogram, to be generated. The data is sent to a specific processing chip which converts the results to an ESR measurement.
Correlation vs Westergren method
YH500E OT vs Inversa
N = 226
Y = 0.889 x +4.78
R = 0,878
YH550 vs Inversa
N = 225
Y = 0.883 x +4.97
R = 0,883
Inter-instrument correlation
YH550E vs YH500E
N = 227
Y = 1,042 x -0,04
R = 0,99
K2 EDTA vs K3 EDTA
The K2 EDTA vs K3 EDTA correlation on the Yumizen H500OT and the Yumizen H550 were R = 0.995, y= 1,053 x -0,26 and R = 0.996, y=1.0 x 0 respectively. It can therefore be concluded that there is no statistical difference between blood taken into the two types of anticoagulant.
Correlation vs Test 1 (alternative method ESR)
The correlation data showed a calibration bias between the two instruments. The application of a calibration factor between the two instruments could be used to provide corrected correlation analysis. The data from both Yumzen analysers showed almost identical results so only the graphical data from the Yumizen H500E is shown below.
YH500E OT vs Test 1 after recalibration
N = 182
Y = 0.952 x +3.86
R = 0.897
Sample Stability
The stability studies were carried out on multiple tubes with results spread across the analysis range. These confirmed a stability of >8hr at ambient temperature and >24hours refrigerated.
The validation protocols performed by the laboratory confirmed the acceptable performance of the CoRA technology of the Yumizen H500 and Yumizen H550 analysers. The two analysers demonstrate acceptable correlation with the Westergren methodology, even with higher values and the inter–instrument correlation and K2 vs K3 EDTA comparisons were excellent, providing confidence that the technology can produce highly consistent results.
The correlation with the Test 1 was also acceptable and cross calibration could eliminate any bias. It is worth noting that there were no exclusions made on the basis of clinical condition. The clinical details of the patients were, however, recorded and this facilitated some additional observations regarding performance with specific pathologies, notably post-operative renal patients, patients post bone-marrow transplant, polytrauma, post-natal sepsis. In these patients, marginally higher values were observed. The values were not sufficient to invalidate the method comparison but, taken in isolation, it could suggest that the Yumizen ESR technology could be more sensitive to inflammation in these cases.
More work needs to be performed but this could lead to additional confirmatory signalling or improved outcome monitoring regarding certain conditions. Because alternative methods focus on only one stage and are less influenced by other non-inflammatory factors such as low haematocrit, blood pH, interferences such as hyperbilirubinemia or hyperlipidaemia can be reduced or eliminated. However, the importance of clinical conditions and the specific effect they have on the formation of rouleaux may skew these alternatives.
A combination approach (CBC + ESR) as used by the Yumizen H500E, would allow for a more rapid estimation of non-specific inflammation.
The compact footprint could also allow for a rapid near-care measure of ESR without requiring any secondary analyser capacity.
Masz pytania lub prośby? Skorzystaj z tego formularza, aby skontaktować się z naszymi specjalistami.