► Click here to download the original poster (PDF)
Marion EVEILLARD1, Mathias CHEA2, Eldad HOD3, Michelle HEGE4, Andrea TORRES4, Desrick J. PINKNEY4, Amin MOHAMMAD4
1Nantes University hospital (FRANCE), 2Nîmes University hospital (FRANCE), 3Columbia University Irving Medical Center (USA), 4Baylor Scott & White Healthcare (USA)
Platelets are involved in many different biological processes. Indeed, circulating platelets mainly differ by size and density. The normal range for platelet size is between 5-10 fL. Therefore, Large Platelet Fraction (LPF) corresponds to the platelet population with a size superior to 20 fL.
This population is mostly composed of large young platelets also called reticulated platelets or immature platelets in physiological situation.
These newly large released platelets in blood flow are thought to be more reactive.
In this multicentric study, we evaluated the LPF count accuracy of the HORIBA Yumizen H2500 analyzers compared to the SYSMEX XN-10 Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) on whole blood samples from pediatric and adult patients. Because no international reference method exists yet to count large platelets, we performed a method comparison between the analyzers.
Yumizen H2500 analyzers count LPF using a combination of resistive (cell volume) and optical extinction measurement into a hydrodynamic focusing flow cell.
The LPF count quantified in the optical chamber is a fluorescent free method. SYSMEX IPF is measured using cell volume and fluorescent dimensions.
This international multicentric study enrolled 794 whole blood samples (from 4 different hospitals centers: Nantes, Nîmes, New York, Baylor).
Once all outliers (flagged results) sorted from statistics (as defined by CLSI EP09c), 655 samples were analyzed. All LPF results are between 0.4 to 23.3% (13% of patients are lower than 2% LPF, 55% from 2 to 10% LPF, 19% from 6 to 10% LPF and 13% higher than 10% LPF).
The comparison between LPF and IPF showed a good correlation (R²=0.71) as shown in figure 1 and figure 2.
Due to the absence of international reference method to measure the proportion of large platelets, customers can only rely on inter-analyzer comparison to assess the accuracy of the large platelet count.
LPF/IPF comparison results demonstrated a good correlation between optical and fluorescent methods highlighting the interchangeability between both analyzers for clinical utility and desired applications.
Do you have any questions or requests? Use this form to contact our specialists.